Document Actions
A contagious thrill
The College's newest endowed chair holder has a five-year mission - spread a love for teaching through the Liberal Arts.
![]() |
| L-R: Melanie Hawthorne, Charles Zhang, Stephen Daniel, Heidi Campbell, Adam Seipp, and Esther Quintana met at J. Cody’s for dinner and a discussion about teaching. Hawthorne and Daniel met with these faculty during the spring 2007 semester as part of a project in the Center for Teaching Excellence. |
As the College of Liberal Arts looks to the future, teaching excellence will play a greater role in assessing overall departmental effectiveness. For Philosophy Professor Steve Daniel, the latest recipient of both the Murray and Celeste Fasken Chair in Distinguished Teaching in the Liberal Arts and a Texas A&M University Presidential Professorship for Teaching Excellence, this news couldn’t come at a better time. Daniel is the type of faculty member who thrives in a research university setting in that he excels in both the research and the teaching arenas, but his deepseated passion lies with teaching.
As an award-winning teacher with a solid research record to boot, he has some definite ideas about helping faculty members who want to improve their teaching skills. Now he has the funds, and the administrative support, to put his ideas into action.
Pathways visited with Steve Daniel to learn more about his commitment to teaching in a university setting.
PATHWAYS: When did you first realize you might want to pursue a
teaching career?
SHD: As an undergraduate, I discovered that I really enjoyed
explaining concepts to my classmates. Once, when one of my teachers
admitted to not understanding a particular point in Nietzsche, I jumped
in and started explaining how the point was related to other aspects of
Nietzsche’s thought that I had studied in another course. I volunteered
to give a presentation on the topic in the next class; that is when I
realized that this was too much fun to give up.
PATHWAYS: Why do you enjoy teaching?
SHD: I love it because it gives me a chance every day to run
ideas past students who, for the most part, are genuinely interested in
exploring ways of thinking they have never considered before. Even
after more than 30 years of doing this, I get excited every time I walk
into the classroom because I know this class will be the one in which a
student will hear something or think something that will click and make
all the difference. It might be some esoteric point by a little known
philosopher, or it might be some grand idea about the meaning of life —
either way, the thrill of such a realization is contagious, and I want
to be around to help it spread.
PATHWAYS: Do you have a teaching philosophy?
SHD: Yes. You don’t teach material, you teach students. Before I
begin a course, before I make up an exam or assignment, before I meet
with a class on any day, I ask (1) why should my students care about
what we are discussing, (2) how can I interest my students by
clarifying the issues we address, and (3) what skills or information
would I want them to take from this activity and retain one year or
five years from now?
PATHWAYS: How has your approach to teaching at Texas A&M
changed over the past 24 years?
SHD: I used to think that students learned best simply by being
exposed to great ideas. I now know that that is not enough. Today’s
students want to be persuaded that what they learn is worthwhile, and
that requires enticing them into ways of thinking that initially seem
to many of them as beside-the-point, even bizarre. My task thus now
demands that I approach my teaching as an art rather than merely a
skill, and part of the artistry of my craft is that I show my students
how someone can enthusiastically adopt a variety of perspectives and
still exhibit intellectual integrity. That’s not easy, but as the 17th
century philosopher Baruch Spinoza wrote, “All things excellent are as
difficult as they are rare.”
PATHWAYS: How do you plan to use the Fasken Chair to affect
teaching in the Liberal Arts?
SHD: Last year I participated in the Faculty Teaching Academy, a
program sponsored by the University’s Center for Teaching Excellence in
which faculty came together for lunch once a month to talk about how
they could become better teachers. Each of those lunches provided me
with an opportunity to re-think what I am doing in the classroom and to
expect more from myself for the benefit of my students. With the funds
from the Fasken Chair, I want to give faculty in the College the
opportunity to experience that same sense of pedagogic excitement.
Perhaps faculty could share a lunch or dinner where small groups meet
to discuss a chapter or two from a book like Ken Bain’s What the
Best College Teachers Do (Harvard University Press, 2004). Perhaps
they could participate in a mini-conference in a particular discipline
where invited speakers would meet with them to compare notes about
challenges they have faced and how they have addressed them. Perhaps
they could form study groups that would meet throughout a whole
semester. Regardless of how it is done, my aim is to help all of us in
the College become better teachers. And because the funding of the
Fasken Chair is substantial and lasts for five years, it really can
have a major impact.


